TRAINING.

Overview

After participating in this course, you will be able to:

• Identify and document the preventive maintenance process, including key components, funding needs, and budget preparation.
• Plan, implement, and justify a preventive maintenance program using rational steps and cost-effective decision-making.
• Evaluate and select appropriate pavement preservation treatments through decision trees, matrices, and lifecycle analysis.
• Use systems to document the positive impact of sustainable preservation techniques and optimize pavement life.
• Effectively communicate the benefits of structured pavement preservation to managers and elected officials.

Description

The need to preserve our municipal pavement infrastructure is paramount to ensuring the viability of transportation of people and goods. This requires increased investments because of the increased size of the roadway network and increased commercial vehicle loading. We need new approaches to support our ability to maintain and improve the infrastructure effectively.

The pressure to preserve pavement infrastructure in the face of increased needs and to utilize new technologies and improved management procedures is greatest at the municipal level. Municipalities typically have limited taxation powers and often lack in-house specialized technical expertise.

Several agencies, including the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), have championed the use of preventive maintenance (PM) early in the life of a pavement, before any significant deterioration, as a cost-effective way to extend service life. In the FHWA publication, Pavement Preservation, A Road Map to the Future, PM is defined as the planned strategy of cost-effective treatments to an existing roadway system and its appurtenances that preserves the system, retards future deterioration, and maintains or improves the functional condition of the system (without significantly increasing the structural capacity)”. FHWA adds that PM is typically applied to pavements in good condition having significant remaining service life.

As a major component of pavement preservation, PM is a strategy of extending the service life by applying cost-effective treatments to the surface or near-surface of structurally sound pavements.”

Who Should Attend

• Architects and engineers involved in pavement evaluation and management
• Agencies and other owners of highway, municipal and private sector pavement infrastructure
• State DOT and municipal agencies
• Contractors interested in advancing pavement preservation technology

Please note: You can check other time zones here.

Syllabus

Course Outline

This course covers:

• Outline the key components of a successful pavement preservation program
• Evaluate the performance of various common maintenance and rehabilitation treatments
• Analyze the PM treatment costs —typical costs and variability of individual PM treatments
• Determine whether the benefits of applying PM treatment to a roadway justify the costs associated with the treatment and identify the factors (roadway classification, pavement type and pavement condition prior to treatment) for which a given PM treatment can be considered cost-effective
• Evaluate the applicability of various PM treatments

Instructor

David Hein, P.Eng

David is a consulting Civil Engineer with over 38 years of experience in designing, evaluating and managing transportation infrastructure. He is the past president of the American Society of Civil Engineers Transportation and Development Institute (ASCE T&DI), chair of the Workforce Development and Codes and Standards Councils and chair of 5 engineering standards committees. He is a long-term member of the Transportation Association of Canada (TAC), Past-Chair of the pavements committee and member of the Soils and Materials and Asset Management Committees.

He is also a member of the Workforce Development Council and Chair of the Professional Development Committee. He is also a past member of the Transportation Research Board pavement management, pavement maintenance and pavement preservation committees. He has represented Canada on the World Road Association (WRA) pavements and asset management committees since 2002 and is currently the Chair of the Canadian National Committee to the WRA. He recently stepped down after 10 years as Executive Director of the Falling Weight Deflectometer User Group.

He has been involved in numerous national and international research, evaluation and asset management projects for Federal, State, Provincial and Municipal agencies and many of the public/private/ partnership highway construction projects across Canada and the United States.